Brussels Ibis in Relation to Other Instruments on the Global Level

  • Lazić V
  • Stuij S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter will discuss the relationship between the Brussels Ibis Regulation and other international conventions which regulate the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments or arbitral awards in civil and commer-cial matters. Since a number of such conventions are in force, a possible colli-sion with the Brussels Ibis Regulation may occur. As to the preceding Brussels I Regulation, the Court of Justice has already addressed the problem of conventions that may concur with the Regulation. This raises the question whether this case law remains untouched by the entry into force of the Brussels Ibis Regulation. Also, the relationship of Brussels Ibis with the Hague Convention on Choice-of-Court Agreements of 2005 will be discussed, since this Convention has not been signed by Member States but instead by the Council on behalf of the European Union. Thus, a different approach to a possible collision between the two instru-ment may be required. Lastly, the position of the New York Arbitration Convention of 1958 will be dealt with. Though explicitly excluded from the substantive scope

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lazić, V., & Stuij, S. (2017). Brussels Ibis in Relation to Other Instruments on the Global Level. In Brussels Ibis Regulation (pp. 119–152). T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-147-0_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free