Corticosteroids or platelet-rich plasma injections for rotator cuff tendinopathy: a randomized clinical trial study

32Citations
Citations of this article
138Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Studies evaluating the role of both corticosteroids and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathies have been contradicting. We compared structural and clinical changes in RC muscles after corticosteroids and PRP injections. Methods: This is a randomized double-blind clinical trial. All individuals with diagnosis of RC tendinitis during 2014–2017 were considered. Individuals were randomly allocated to either receive PRP or corticosteroids. Overall, 3cc of PRP was injected within the subacromial joint and another 3cc was injected at the site of the tendon tear, under the guide of sonography. For the corticosteroid group, 1cc of Depo-medrol 40mg and 1cc of lidocaine (2%) was injected within the subacromial joint. Results: Overall, 58 patients entered the study. Comparison of pain, range of motion (ROM), Western Ontario RC (WORC), Disability of Arm-Hand-Shoulder (DASH) scores, and supraspinatus thickness showed significant improvement during follow-ups in both groups (p<0.05). During 3 months of follow-up, pain improvement was significantly better within the PRP group during (from 6.66±2.26 to 3.08±2.14 and 5.53±1.80 to 3.88±1.99, respectively; p=0.023). Regarding ROM, the PRP group had significant improvement in adduction (20.50°±8.23° to 28°±3.61° and 23.21°±7.09° to 28.46°±4.18° for the PRP and corticosteroid groups, respectively; p=0.011) and external rotation (59.66°±23.81° to 76.66°±18.30° and 57.14°±24.69° to 65.57°±26.39°, for the PRP and corticosteroid groups, respectively; p=0.036) compared to the corticosteroid group. Conclusion: We found that PRP renders similar results to that of corticosteroids in most clinical aspects among patients with RC tendinopathies; however, pain and ROM may show more significant improvement with the use of PRP. Considering that the use of corticosteroids may be contraindicated in some patients and may be associated with the risk of tendon rupture, we suggest the use of PRP in place of corticosteroid-based injections among patients with RC tendinopathy. Trial registration: Clinical trial registration code: IRCT201302174251N9

References Powered by Scopus

Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP)

3670Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: Longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery

818Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measuring shoulder function: A systematic review of four questionnaires

587Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Ultrasound-guided injection of platelet-rich plasma for tendinopathies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Platelet-rich plasma does not improve clinical results in patients with rotator cuff disorders but reduces the retear rate. A systematic review and meta-analysis

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

PLATELET-RICH PLASMA INJECTION IN NON-OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF PARTIAL-THICKNESS ROTATOR CUFF TEARS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dadgostar, H., Fahimipour, F., Pahlevan Sabagh, A., Arasteh, P., & Razi, M. (2021). Corticosteroids or platelet-rich plasma injections for rotator cuff tendinopathy: a randomized clinical trial study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02470-x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

61%

Researcher 4

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 16

44%

Medicine and Dentistry 14

39%

Social Sciences 3

8%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free