Children and 'smart' technologies: Can children's experiences be interpreted and coded?

15Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper has a focus on young children and their emerging new technologies. It examines children's drawings as an evaluation tool for capturing their experiences of different novel interfaces. A recent evaluation study with children and two follow-up expert coding sessions were used to demonstrate how drawings could be used and coded and how the intercoder reliability could be improved. Usability and User Experience (UX) factors: Fun (F), Goal Fit (GF) and Tangible Magic (TM) were included in the coding scheme and they were the factors that have been looked at in the coding sessions. Our studies show the thoroughness and ease-of-use of the drawing method. The method was effective and reliable in conveying the user experience form the drawings. It also shows some of the limitation of the method: e.g. resource intensive and open to evaluator's interpretation. From the result of the study, a number of the drawings conveyed information pertaining to user experiences: F, GF and TM, and the method was particularly reliable at capturing fun.The result also led to the correlation found on the GF and TM. © 2009 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xu, D. Y., Read, J. C., Sim, G., McManus, B., & Qualter, P. (2009). Children and “smart” technologies: Can children’s experiences be interpreted and coded? In People and Computers XXIII Celebrating People and Technology - Proceedings of HCI 2009 (pp. 224–231). British Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/hci2009.26

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free