Comparing mathieu and tubularized incised-plate urethroplasties for repairing distal penile hypospadias: A single-center experience with long-term outcome

Abstract

Background: Hypospadias is a congenital anomaly on the penis, in which the meatal orifice opens ventrally and proximal to the tip of the penis. In this regard, two common treatment methods are tubularized incised-plate urethroplasty (TIP) and the Mathieu incised-plate (MIP) technique. The present study aimed to compare the early and long-term outcomes of TIP and MIP among patients with distal penile hypospadias. Objectives: The study was also to evaluate the postoperative functional outcome of hypospadias over a long-term follow-up. Methods: Fifty-nine patients were randomly selected and assigned to two groups (TIP (n = 31) and MIP (n = 28)). Demographic in-formation, preoperative findings, and postoperative complications were collected from the two groups. The Hypospadias Objective Scoring evaluation (HOSE) questionnaire and uroflowmetry were obtained to evaluate the long-term outcome of hypospadias re-pair. Results: The success rates of the surgical TIP and MIP techniques were 71.0% and 82.1%, respectively. Postoperative complications in the TIP group were three (9.7%) distal UCF and four (12.9%) meatal stenosis. In the MIP group, two (7.1%) and three (10.7%) patients suffered from distal UCF and meatal stenosis, respectively. Moreover, 89.3% of the patients in the MIP group and 80% of the patients in the TIP group had acceptable HOSE. Regarding the uroflow rates in the MIP group, 12% and 58% of the participants were below the 5th percentile and above the 25th percentile, respectively. Concerning the uroflow rates of TIP, 32% of the patients were below the 5th percentile, and 18% of the participants were above 25th percentile. Conclusions: Although there have been some reports on the superiority of TIP, we found these two techniques at approximately equal levels with a slightly higher success rate for the MIP regarding the early outcomes. With the exception of the long-term outcomes in cosmetic and functional evaluation, MIP is superior to TIP.