Public perception of the terms "cosmetic," "plastic," and "reconstructive" surgery

23Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate potential differences in perception of the terms "cosmetic," "plastic," and "reconstructive" as descriptors for surgery. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was offered to subjects over 18 years of age throughout the Unites States via the Internet and in person. The multiple-choice survey measured variables including permanence, risk, expense, recovery, reversibility, pain, technical difficulty, and surgeon training. The questionnaire also included several open-ended questions to capture qualitative perceptions. Semantic differential data were analyzed to measure statistical significance. Results: For most variables-permanence, risk, recovery, reversibility, pain, and surgeon training-the 216 subjects had significantly lower mean responses for cosmetic surgery than those for plastic or reconstructive surgery (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hamilton, G. S., Carrithers, J. S., & Karnell, L. H. (2004). Public perception of the terms “cosmetic,” “plastic,” and “reconstructive” surgery. Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery, 6(5), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.6.5.315

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free