Learning of a simple grapho-motor task by young children and adults: Similar acquisition but age-dependent retention

33Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Many new skills are acquired during early childhood. Typical laboratory skill learning tasks are not applicable for developmental studies that involve children younger than 8 years of age. It is not clear whether young children and adults share a basic underlying skill learning mechanism. In the present study, the learning and retention of a simple grapho-motor pattern were studied in three age groups: 5-6, 7-8, and 19-29 years. Each block of the task consists of identical patterns arranged in a spaced writing array. Progression across the block involves on-page movements while producing the pattern, and off-page movements between patterns. The participants practiced the production of the pattern using a digitizing tablet and were tested at 24 h and 2 weeks post-practice. All age groups produced the task blocks more quickly with practice, and the learning rate was inversely related to the initial production time. All groups exhibited additional gains 24 h post-practice that were well-retained 2 weeks later. The accuracy of the participants was maintained throughout the 2-weeks period. These findings suggest that young children and young adults use a similar mechanism when learning the task. Nevertheless, the 6-years-old spent more time off-page during retention testing than when tested at 24 h post-practice, thus supporting the notion that an age advantage may exists in the long-term retention of skills due to planning-dependent aspects.

Figures

  • FIGURE 1 |The “invented letter” stimuli. (A) A single stimulus.Writing direction A-B-C. (B) A block of the invented letter task. The writing direction is from right-to-left.
  • Table 1 | Analysis of variance (ANOVA) results on the study production measures.
  • FIGURE 2 | Speed and accuracy data (mean and standard error): initial training (Init-tr, blocks 1–4 on day 1), end-training (End-tr, blocks 9–12 on day 1), 24 h post-training (24 h-post), and 2 weeks post-training (2 wks-post). (A)Time per block. (B) Number of erroneous patterns produced.
  • FIGURE 3 | Production data. (A) Overall time. The four points represent the average across the four blocks of the four time points depicted in Figure 2A. (B) On-page time. (C) Off-page time. (D) Number of pen strokes per block. The minimum value is 15 strokes.

References Powered by Scopus

The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory

31158Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Toward an Instance Theory of Automatization

2533Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Acquisition of cognitive skill

2342Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Motor control of handwriting in the developing brain: A review

85Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Is handwriting performance affected by the writing surface? Comparing preschoolers', second graders', and adults' writing performance on a tablet vs. paper

66Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Children's ability to learn a motor skill is related to handwriting and reading proficiency

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Julius, M. S., & Adi-Japha, E. (2015). Learning of a simple grapho-motor task by young children and adults: Similar acquisition but age-dependent retention. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(MAR). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00225

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 29

64%

Researcher 8

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 13

48%

Neuroscience 5

19%

Sports and Recreations 5

19%

Social Sciences 4

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free