Anchorage influence by production method and root pruning

8Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The objectives were to 1) compare the post-planting anchorage of container-grown and field-grown (balled-and-burlapped) live oaks (Quercus virginiana Mill.), and 2) evaluate the effects of root pruning and post-planting irrigation placement on anchorage and growth. At seven months after planting, field-grown trees were approximately 50% better secured to the soil than trees from containers. However, removing the peripheral 5 cm of the container root ball at planting improved anchorage of container-grown trees by approximately 13% without reducing diameter growth or causing visible symptoms. Irrigation placement (applied directly on the root ball or to a wider area) had no effect on anchorage and growth. There appeared to be no benefit to irrigating the soil around the root ball during tree establishment in the fine sand soils that receive 120 mm annual rainfall. © 2013 International Society of Arboriculture.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gilman, E. F. (2013). Anchorage influence by production method and root pruning. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, 39(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2013.001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free