Children’s and adolescents’ relationship to pain during cancer treatment: A preliminary validation of the pain flexibility scale for children

10Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: Children with cancer often suffer from pain. Pain is associated with psychological distress, which may amplify the pain experience. In chronic pain, it has been shown that psychological acceptance is helpful for both adults and children. For experimentally induced pain, interventions fostering psychological acceptance have been shown to predict increases in pain tolerance and reductions in pain intensity and discomfort of pain. A single subject study aiming to nurture psychological acceptance for children with cancer experiencing pain has shown promising results. No instruments measuring psychological acceptance in acute pain are yet available. The aim of the current study was to develop and preliminarily evaluate an instrument to measure psychological acceptance in children experiencing pain during cancer treatment. Methods: A test version of the Pain Flexibility Scale for Children was sent to all children aged 7–18 years undergoing cancer treatment in Sweden at the time of the study. Exploratory factor analysis was used. Internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and convergent validity were examined. Results: Sixty-one children participated in the study. A two-factor solution with Promax rotation was found to best represent the data. Internal consistency was good to excellent (a =0.87–0.91). The total scale and the subscales demonstrated temporal stability (Intraclass correlation coefficient =0.56–0.61) and satisfactory convergent validity (r=−0.27 to −0.68). Discussion: The Pain Flexibility Scale for Children measuring psychological acceptance in children with cancer experiencing pain is now available for use. This enables the evaluation of acceptance as a mediator for treatment change in the context of acute pain in children with cancer, which in turn is a step forward in the development of psychological treatments to help children cope with the pain during these difficult circumstances. The scale shows good psychometric properties but needs further validation, particularly considering the small sample size.

References Powered by Scopus

Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires

7812Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology

7264Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and Validation

6268Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Effectiveness of Conventional Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Its Computerized Version on Reduction in Pain Intensity, Depression, Anger, and Anxiety in Children with Cancer: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A preliminary validation of the Swedish short version of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y8) for children and adolescents with cancer

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A preliminary validation of the swedish version of the pain catastrophizing scale for children (PCSC) for children and adolescents with cancer

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thorsell Cederberg, J., Strandskov, S. W., Dahl, J. A., & Ljungman, G. (2017). Children’s and adolescents’ relationship to pain during cancer treatment: A preliminary validation of the pain flexibility scale for children. Journal of Pain Research, 10, 1171–1178. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S137871

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

71%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

25%

Researcher 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 19

63%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

20%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

10%

Social Sciences 2

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0