Sewer systems play a key role in cities to ensure public assets and safety. Timely detection of defects can effectively alleviate system deterioration. Conventional manual inspection is labor-intensive, error-prone and expensive. Object detection is a powerful deep learning technique that can complement and/or replace conventional inspection, especially in complex environments. This study compares two classic object-detection methods, namely faster region-based convolutional neural network (R-CNN) and You Only Look Once (YOLO), for the detection and localization of five types of sewer defects. Model performances are evaluated based on their detection accuracy and processing speed under parameterization impacts of dataset size and training parameters. Results show that faster R-CNN achieved higher prediction accuracy. Training dataset size and maximum number of epochs (MaxE) had dominant impacts on model performances of faster R-CNN and YOLO, respectively. The processing speed increased along with the increasing training data for faster R-CNN, but did not vary significantly for YOLO. The models' abilities to detect disjoint and residential wall were highest, whereas crack and tree root were more difficult to detect. The results help to better understand the strengths and weaknesses of the classic methods and provide a useful user guidance for practical applications in automated sewer defect detection.
CITATION STYLE
Zhou, Q., Situ, Z., Teng, S., Chen, W., Chen, G., & Su, J. (2022). Comparison of classic object-detection techniques for automated sewer defect detection. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 24(2), 406–419. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2022.132
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.