In this paper I argue that some human reproductive genome editing interventions can be therapeutic in nature, and thus that it is false that all such interventions just create healthy individuals. I do this by showing that the conditions established by a therapy definition are met by certain reproductive genome editing interventions. I then defend this position against two objections: (a) reproductive genome editing interventions do not attain one of the two conditions for something to be a therapy, and (b) some reproductive genome editing interventions are therapeutic but in a nonstandard way. In the Conclusion I call for a more nuanced discussion of the nature of reproductive genome editing interventions.
CITATION STYLE
Palacios-González, C. (2021). Reproductive genome editing interventions are therapeutic, sometimes. Bioethics, 35(6), 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12846
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.