Antipseudomonal Versus Narrow-Spectrum Agents for the Treatment of Community-Onset Intra-abdominal Infections

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background. Antipseudomonal antibiotics are often used to treat community-acquired intra-abdominal infections (CA-IAIs) despite common causative pathogens being susceptible to more narrow-spectrum agents. The purpose of this study was to compare treatment-associated complications in adult patients treated for CA-IAI with antipseudomonal versus narrow-spectrum regimens. Methods. This retrospective cohort study included patients >18 years admitted for CA-IAI treated with antibiotics. The primary objective of this study was to compare 90-day treatment-associated complications between patients treated empirically with antipseudomonal versus narrow-spectrum regimens. Secondary objectives were to compare infection and treatment characteristics along with patient outcomes. Subgroup analyses were planned to compare outcomes of patients with low-risk and high-risk CA-IAIs and patients requiring surgical intervention versus medically managed. Results. A total of 350 patients were included: antipseudomonal, n = 204; narrow spectrum, n = 146. There were no differences in 90-day treatment-associated complications between groups (antipseudomonal 15.1% vs narrow spectrum 11.3%, P = .296). In addition, no differences were observed in hospital length of stay, 90-day readmission, Clostridiodes difficile, or mortality. In multivariate logistic regression, treatment with a narrow-spectrum regimen (odds ratio [OR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.39–1.45) was not independently associated with the primary outcome. No differences were observed in 90-day treatment-associated complications for (1) patients with low-risk (antipseudomonal 15% vs narrow spectrum 9.6%, P = .154) or high-risk CA-IAI (antipseudomonal 15.8% vs narrow spectrum 22.2%, P = .588) or (2) those who were surgically (antipseudomonal 8.5% vs narrow spectrum 9.2%, P = .877) or medically managed (antipseudomonal 23.1 vs narrow spectrum 14.5, P = .178). Conclusions. Treatment-associated complications were similar among patients treated with antipseudomonal and narrow-spectrum antibiotics. Antipseudomonal therapy is likely unnecessary for most patients with CA-IAI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Worden, L. J., Dumkow, L. E., VanLangen, K. M., Beuschel, T. S., & Jameson, A. P. (2021). Antipseudomonal Versus Narrow-Spectrum Agents for the Treatment of Community-Onset Intra-abdominal Infections. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab514

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free