Analysts’Optimism and Selection Bias

  • Martinez A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper is an empirical examination, drawing on the Institutional Brokers Estimate System (I/B/E/S) database, of analysts' earnings forecast optimism for Brazilian companies. The study found that analysts were optimistic on average and performed poorly in terms of precision and accuracy. The study period was January 1995 to December 2002. The forecasting errors in one period were correlated with the errors of the following period. There was evidence of persistent consensus errors among analysts, with those who were persistently optimistic outweighing those who were persistently pessimistic. A possible explanation for this predominant overoptimism is selection bias. In order to adjust analysts' consensus forecasts, an optimization methodology is suggested, providing results that minimize the optimism bias. The evidence presented is relevant, especially for those using analysts' earnings forecasts as an input in their stock valuation models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martinez, A. L. (2007). Analysts’Optimism and Selection Bias. Brazilian Business Review, 4(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2007.4.2.2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free