An uneven playing field: Talent identification systems and the perpetuation of participation biases in high performance sport

4Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Participation in sport is often held up as an ideal activity for the development of productive youth, minimization of disease risk and maximizing quality of life. Unfortunately, there is overwhelming support for the conclusion that sport and athlete development systems perpetuate systematic biases affecting who has access to sporting opportunities. In particular, several biases emerge from talent identification practices that target those at young ages and from environmental constraints that similarly influence young athletes’ development. In this chapter, we use the theory of Life Cycle Skill Formation (LCSF; Cunha and Heckman, Journal of Human Resources, 43, 738-782, 2008; Cunha et al., Handbook of the economics of education. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2006) to review three significant biases on athlete development. Moreover, we will highlight several avenues that might improve rates of sport participation and identify several areas where future work is necessary.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wattie, N., & Baker, J. (2017). An uneven playing field: Talent identification systems and the perpetuation of participation biases in high performance sport. In Sport and Physical Activity Across the Lifespan: Critical Perspectives (pp. 117–133). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48562-5_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free