The other, shame, and politics: Levinas, justice, and feeling responsible

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Adi Ophir has suggested that the political realm is an order of evils, producing and managing regular forms of suffering and violence rather than eliminating them. Thus, the political is always to some extent a corrupted order of justice. Emmanuel Levinas’ work presents in its focus on the face-to-face relationship a means of rethinking how to make the political more open to compassionate justice. Though Levinas himself doesn’t sufficiently take on this question, I argue that his work facilitates a way of thinking about commiserative shame that provides a means to connect the face-to-face to its potential effects in the political sphere. If such shame isn’t ignored or bypassed, it produces an unsettling relation to the other that in its adversity motivates a kind of responsibility and care for the other that can alter the public sphere.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Larocco, S. (2018). The other, shame, and politics: Levinas, justice, and feeling responsible. Religions, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9120381

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free