We report our 3-year experience using a modification of the percutaneous technique for extrathoracic subclavian venipuncture proposed by Magney and colleagues for permanent pacing lead placement. Before surgery bony landmarks were marked on the skin according to Magney's description to identify the needle entry point and the target point corresponding to the ideal location of the extrathoracic portion of the subclavian vein. Then the venipuncture was accomplished by inserting the needle through a standard infraclavicular pacemaker pocket. Two hundred fifty patients undergoing primary pacemaker implant (231 patients) or reimplant or change of mode of pacing (19 patients) were included in the study. The technique was successful in 245 (98%) cases. Inadvertent puncture of the subclavian artery occurred in 5 (2%) patients but in no case did it jeopardize the success of the implant procedure. No major complications were observed. Seven (2.9%) patients experienced early complications unrelated to the venous approach: 2 subclavian vein thrombosis, 5 lead dislodgment in 4 patients, and 1 pocket hematoma. During a mean follow-up of 15.2 months (range 4-40) no lead or patient related complications occurred. In the present study the blind approach to the extrathoracic portion of the subclavian vein proved to be safe and effective for pacing lead insertion. Further observations are required to establish whether this method extends the lead survival.
CITATION STYLE
Gardini, A., & Benedini, G. (1998). Blind extrathoracic subclavian venipuncture for pacemaker implant: A 3-year experience in 250 patients. PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 21(11 II), 2304–2308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01171.x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.