Analysis of risk factors for postoperative delirium after liver transplantation

8Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: The study aimed to analyze the incidence of postoperative delirium (POD) and associated risk factors after liver transplantation (LT). Patients and Methods: We identified and enrolled patients undergoing LT at the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University between August 2018 and May 2019. We abstracted their relevant clinical information and assigned the patients into a POD group and non-POD group to compare differences in clinical information. Risk factors of POD were analyzed using logistic regression. Results: A total of 159 LT patients were enrolled. Forty-two patients exhibited delirium (26.4%). Of the 42 with delirium, 33 (78.6%) had delirium within 3 days postoperatively and a median duration of 5 days (quartile 3–7 days). The results of binary logistic regression are as follows: preoperative ammonia (≥46 vs <46 μmol/L; OR 3.51, 95% CI [1.31–9.46], P<0.05), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (≥15 vs.<15; OR 3.33, 95% CI [1.27–8.79], P<0.05), presence of hepatic encephalopathy (OR 3.30, 95% CI [1.20–9.07], P<0.05), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) on day 1 postoperatively (OR 1.33, 95% CI [1.06 −1.68], P<0.05), anhepatic period (OR 1.04, 95% CI [1.02 −1.06], P<0.01). The POD group had a longer intubation time (2925.0 vs 1410.0 min, P<0.01), ICU length of stay (6 vs 4 d, P<0.01) and increased medical costs (43.96 vs 33.74 ten thousand yuan, P<0.01). Conclusion: The incidence of POD in LT patients is a significant clinical feature. Ammonia ≥46 μmol/l, MELD score ≥15, hepatic encephalopathy, anhepatic period, and AST at 1 day postoperatively were independent risk factors for POD.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, J., Wang, H., He, Z., & Li, T. (2020). Analysis of risk factors for postoperative delirium after liver transplantation. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 16, 1645–1652. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S254920

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free