Participatory science communication needs to consider power, place, pain and ‘poisson’: a practitioner insight

5Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The language of science communication has moved from deficit to dialogue and talk of a ‘new social contract’ with the public ‘invited to participate’. This paper outlines a practitioner path that begins with storytelling and moves to a more participatory mode of practice of science communication for adaptation to climate change at the community scale. I outline personal practitioner reflections, specifically the need to consider issues of power, place, pain and the need to challenge assumptions. I propose the need to consider context, many forms of local knowledge and expertise, social learning, plus the pain of historical, contemporary or projected loss.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leitch, A. (2022). Participatory science communication needs to consider power, place, pain and ‘poisson’: a practitioner insight. Journal of Science Communication, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.21020801

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free