Cryptogames: The promises of blockchain for the future of the videogame industry

11Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Videogames are an increasingly prominent use case for blockchain technology (what has been termed ‘cryptogaming’). Drawing on documents, such as industry presentations, social media posts, interviews and white papers, this article analyses discourses surrounding cryptogames, focusing on the claims made by cryptogame developers and investors. We ask two related research questions: What are the dominant visions of a cryptogaming future, imagined by and for various constituencies? And what sorts of values get realised in such an imagined future of game development and use? We argue that cryptogames imagine players and developers as financialised subjects, adopting attitudes and practices of risk and investment as salves to both microeconomic problems in the games industry as well as broader macroeconomic issues.

References Powered by Scopus

The sociology of expectations in science and technology

1327Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Economic markets as calculative collective devices

1022Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The anthropology of the future

345Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Who will govern the metaverse? Examining governance initiatives for extended reality (XR) technologies

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Blockchain Potentials for the Game Industry: A Review

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Playbor, gamble-play, and the financialization of digital games

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Egliston, B., & Carter, M. (2023). Cryptogames: The promises of blockchain for the future of the videogame industry. New Media and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231158614

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 7

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

43%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 5

38%

Computer Science 4

31%

Social Sciences 3

23%

Decision Sciences 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free