Evolution of analytical performance in 10 portable glucose meters in the last decade

40Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE - To assess and compare the technical accuracy of portable glucose meters during the last decade. RESEARCH DISIGN AND METHODS - One Thousand preprandial (pre) and postprandial (post) capillary whole-blood glucose values measured with meters owned mainly by diabetic patients were compared with a single laboratory method yearly from 1989 to 1999. A total of 21,950 capillary measurements and their corresponding laboratory reference values were analyzed at our clinic. RESULTS - The lowest mean absolute difference was found in 1989 (pre: 2 ± 22 mg/dl, post: 9 ± 31 mg/dl) (mean ± SD). The highest mean absolute difference was observed in 1993 (pre: 31 ± 33 mg/dl) and 1996 (post: 50 ± 35 mg/dl). The highest mean relative deviation was observed in 1990 (pre: 16.4%) and 1996 (post: 20.6%). The highest percentage of readings that were within a 5% deviation limit were observed in 1998 (pre: 44.5%) and in 1997 (post: 36.7%). Based on blood glucose levels within ±5 and ±10% of laboratory values, the technical accuracy of meters was similar for 1989 and 1999 (P = 0.27 and 0.52, respectively). The percentage of pre values in zone A of Clarke's error grid analysis was >90% in 1989, 1997, 1998, and 1999. CONCLUSIONS - The analytical performance of glucose meters decreased between 1990 and 1996 but was restored between 1997 and 1999. Nevertheless, our data suggest that the technical accuracy of glucose meters has not significantly improved during the last decade. Complementary studies taking into account the preanalytical improvements of the recent meters, as well as their calibration method, appear necessary.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Böhme, P., Floriot, M., Sirveaux, M. A., Durain, D., Ziegler, O., Drouin, P., & Guerci, B. (2003). Evolution of analytical performance in 10 portable glucose meters in the last decade. Diabetes Care, 26(4), 1170–1175. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.4.1170

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free