Total shoulder replacement in young and middle-aged patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis

125Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Our aim in this prospective study was to evaluate the outcome of total shoulder replacement in the treatment of young and middle-aged active patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. We reviewed 21 patients (21 shoulders) with a mean age of 55 years (37 to 60). The mean follow-up was seven years (5 to 9). The same anatomical, third-generation, cemented implant had been used in all patients. All the patients were evaluated radiologically and clinically using the Constant and Murley score. No patients required revision. In one a tear of the supraspinatus tendon occurred. Overall, 20 patients (95%) were either very satisfied (n = 18) or satisfied (n = 2) with the outcome. Significant differences (p < 0.0001) were found for all categories of the Constant and Murley score pre- and post-operatively. The mean Constant and Murley score increased from 24.1 points (10 to 45) to 64.5 points (39 to 93), and the relative score from 30.4% (11% to 50%) to 83% (54% to 116%). No clinical or radiological signs of loosening of the implant were seen. For young and middle-aged patients with osteoarthritis, third-generation total shoulder replacement is a viable method of treatment with a low rate of complications and excellent results in the mid-term. ©2008 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Raiss, P., Aldinger, P. R., Kasten, P., Rickert, M., & Loew, M. (2008). Total shoulder replacement in young and middle-aged patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B, 90(6), 764–769. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B6.20387

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free