Downscaling of Landsat 8 land surface temperature products based on deep learning

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The downscaling method using spectral index as trend surface factor is widely used in remote sensing land surface temperature scale conversion. However, it is difficult to highlight the distribution of land surface temperature and describe the complex relationship between trend surface factor and land surface temperature in statistical model. Therefore, this paper constructs a Land Surface Temperature Downscaling Residual Network (LSTDRN) taking Landsat 8 ARD LST as downscaling objects and Landsat 8 OLI raw data as potential trend surface factors. The LSTDRN aims to explore the trend surface bands or combinations suitable for spatial downscaling of Landsat 8 land surface temperature products, and verify the spatiotemporal applicability of the model.In view of the strong nonlinear relationship fitting and feature extraction ability of deep learning, this paper proposes a LST downscaling model based on deep learning. In the training stage, the relationship model between the Landsat 8 ARD LST and all bands of Landsat 8 OLI (except band 9) is fitted at the low resolution level. The Huber loss function is used to minimize the residual between the prediction results and the label to realize the transformation residual constraint. Then the optimal model is obtained through iterative learning and parameter adjustment. In the test stage, the optimal model is applied at the high resolution level to obtain the final downscaling results according to the "scale invariant" hypothesis of land surface temperature downscaling. In addition to visual evaluation, the downscaling results and original LST data were scaled up to 100 m resolution for quantitative evaluation. After evaluating the downscaling effect of each band, the multi-trend surface factor downscaling experiment was carried out. Meanwhile, the deep learning method is compared with the classic traditional method TsHARP to compare the stability of different land surface types and different seasons.In LSTDRN, using the original single band of Landsat 8 OLI as the trend surface factor has a good downscaling effect, and increasing the number of potential trend surface factors can not improve the downscaling effect. In the experiments of different land cover types, the effect of deep learning method is better than that of traditional methods, and the best effect is when NIR band is the trend surface factor. The order of deep learning downscaling effect in quantitative evaluation of different land cover types is vegetation > building > water, however, there is no obvious difference between the traditional methods. In different season experiments, the downscaling effect in quantitative evaluation of deep learning method in spring, summer and winter is better than that of traditional classical methods, and the downscaling results of the two methods in autumn are similar. Therefore, the proposed LSTDRN has better downscaling effect on Landsat 8 remote sensing land surface temperature products, which is superior to the traditional classical methods and has stronger stability.The LSTDRN proposed in this study can make good use of Landsat 8 OLI single band data as trend surface factors for downscaling. With the increase of trend surface factors, the downscaling effect is not significantly improved. Compared with the classic traditional method TsHARP, the downscaling effect of deep learning method is less affected by land cover types and seasonal factors, and the difference of downscaling effect is rather small in different spatial-temporal conditions. The method has stronger stability, which is conducive to enhancing the applicability of downscaling research and promoting the application of high-quality land surface temperature data.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, Y., Wu, P., Duan, S., Yang, H., & Yin, Z. (2021). Downscaling of Landsat 8 land surface temperature products based on deep learning. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 25(8), 1767–1777. https://doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20211242

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free