Should we recommend stethoscope disinfection before daily usage as an infection control rule?

11Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Many studies have shown that contaminated medical equipments act like a vector for cross-infection. Infection control programmes are effective in decreasing hospital-acquired infection rate, however, the implementation of such programmes is hindered by poor compliance of health care workers. Methods: Random selection of health care workers, at our institution, was given questionnaires and were asked to give their stethoscopes to be sampled. Results: 151 health care workers were involved in this study. Physicians were 79/151 and their stethoscopes were found to be the most contaminated (68.3%). The total number of contaminated stethoscopes was 72/151 (47.7%). Coagulase-negative staphylococcus was isolated from 66 diaphragms from 72 (92%). Conclusion: Nosocomial infections carry a higher level of morbidity and mortality. This study showed that there is lack of good compliance with routinely disinfecting the health care workers stethoscopes. We recommend that the significance of disinfecting diaphragms of stethoscopes should be clarified to the health care workers. © Alothman et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alothman, A., Bukhari, A., Aljohani, S., & Muhanaa, A. (2009). Should we recommend stethoscope disinfection before daily usage as an infection control rule? Open Infectious Diseases Journal, 3(1), 80–82. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874279300903010080

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free