Assessment of Quality of Care for Managed Care and Fee-For-Service Patients Based on Analysis of Avoidable Hospitalizations

Abstract

As managed care has grown to dominate the US health care delivery system, questions have been raised about the impact on the quality of care provided to its enrollees. Two important aspects of health care quality are access to care and the appropriateness of care. This analysis evaluated the occurrence of preventable hospitalizations among managed care (MCO) versus fee for service (FFS) populations to compare access to and appropriateness of preventive, primary, and surgical health care services. Rates of preventable hospitalizations associated with ambulatory sensitive conditions (ASCs) were calculated based on all discharges from Massachusetts hospitals in 1995, and categorized by population characteristics including: age, sex, ethnicity, and insurance status. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed to explain the likelihood of hav- ing a preventable hospitalization. Rates of preventable hospitalizations for two of the conditions evaluated (perforated appendix and diabetes complications) were lower for MCO enrollees. For two additional indicators (immunization preventable pneumonia and low birth weight), MCO rates were no different from FFS rates. Results for pediatric asthma were inconclusive. For four out of five quality indicators evaluated, individuals in Massachusetts MCOs are doing better or no worse than their counterparts in FFS plans. Until population- based data on managed care enrollees becomes available, and until such data can be linked to utilization and health outcomes information, investigations into the quality of services provided by MCOs compared to FFS plans cannot be definitive.