Effects of timing of artificial insemination and treatment of semen with a Slo3 potassium channel blocker on fertility of dairy heifers subjected to the 5-day CIDR-Synch protocol

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of the timing of artificial insemination (AI) and incorporation of the Slo3 K+ channel blocker 4-(4-chlorophenyl)butyl-diethyl-heptylammonium to semen extender (CSE) on pregnancy per AI (P/AI) and pregnancy loss in dairy heifers. In experiment 1, Holstein heifers were subjected to the 5-d CIDR-Synch protocol: d −8 GnRH and controlled internal drug-release device (CIDR); d −3 PGF2α and CIDR removal; d −2 PGF2α; d 0 GnRH) and assigned randomly to receive timed AI with control semen on d 0 (72-CON; n = 104), control semen on d −1 (48-CON; n = 100), or CSE-treated semen on d −1 (48-CSE; n = 98). Heifers were fitted with collar-mounted automated estrus detection devices to monitor physical activity and rumination. In experiment 2, Holstein heifers were subjected to the 5-d CIDR-Synch protocol and received a mount detection patch at the first PGF2α injection. Heifers detected in estrus before d 0 were inseminated on the same day, whereas those not detected in estrus received the second GnRH injection and timed AI on d 0. Heifers were assigned randomly to receive AI with control (AI-CON; n = 148) or CSE-treated semen (AI-CSE; n = 110). Four bulls with proven fertility were used in both experiments, and ejaculates from each sire were divided and processed as CON or CSE. Pregnancy was diagnosed by transrectal ultrasonography at 29 and 54 d after AI. Data were analyzed by logistic regression, and statistical models included the fixed effects of treatment and enrollment week. In experiment 1, orthogonal contrasts were built to assess the effects of day of AI (72-CON vs. 48-CON + 48-CSE) and treatment of semen with CSE (48-CON vs. 48-CSE). Pregnancy per AI on d 29 (72-CON = 60.8, 48-CON = 35.2, 48-CSE = 39.8%) and d 54 (72-CON = 58.2, 48-CON = 31.6, 48-CSE = 36.2%) was greater for heifers inseminated on d 0 compared with d −1. However, no effect of semen extender on P/AI was observed in heifers inseminated on d −1. In experiment 2, P/AI tended to be greater for AI-CSE than for AI-CON on d 29 (58.6 vs. 47.3%) and d 54 after AI (55.6 vs. 43.7%). Advancing AI by 24 h decreased the likelihood of pregnancy, and use of CSE was unable to overcome the expected asynchrony between insemination and ovulation. Nevertheless, incorporation of CSE in semen processing tended to improve P/AI when heifers received AI upon detected estrus or timed AI concurrently with the final GnRH of the 5-d CIDR-Synch protocol.