Skip to main content
Journal ArticleOPEN ACCESS

The plural unification of sciences: the epistemological contributions of a perpetually dissatisfied discipline

  • Malighetti R
International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology (2019) 3(1)
DOI: 10.1186/s41257-019-0016-8
1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

… This is the trap into which many anthropological appropriations of hermeneutics have fallen. The ethnographies of the founding fathers of … As Geertz maintained, there is little benefit in saying with Herskovits that ‘morality is a universal, and so is the enjoyment of beauty, and …

References Powered by Scopus

Soziologie im Physikalismus

Erkenntnis
65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Restructuring the social sciences: Reflections from harvard's institute for quantitative social science

PS - Political Science and Politics
57Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Human Terrain System and Anthropology: A Review of Ongoing Public Debates

American Anthropologist
51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text
View more at Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Malighetti, R. (2019). The plural unification of sciences: the epistemological contributions of a perpetually dissatisfied discipline. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257-019-0016-8

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 2

50%

Philosophy 1

25%

Arts and Humanities 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free