Comparative usability study of the dulaglutide single-use pen versus the insulin degludec FlexTouch® among self-injection-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan

8Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: This study assessed training time with the dulaglutide single-use pen (SUP) and the insulin degludec disposable prefilled pen (FlexTouch®) in self-injection–naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Japan. Methods: This multi-center, open-label, comparative, crossover study measured training time with the dulaglutide SUP vs FlexTouch®. Participants learned how to use both devices in a randomly assigned order. Healthcare providers (HCP) conducted the training. The primary end-point was the time required to train self-injection-naïve T2DM participants to self-inject correctly using each device. Secondary end-points included performance measures, such as success and error rates, patient perceptions related to ease-of-use, and factors associated with training time and performance. Results: Overall, 48 participants were randomized and completed the study. The mean training time to achieve correct administration was significantly shorter with the dulaglutide SUP vs FlexTouch® (7.4 min vs 19.7 min, p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Asakura, T., Suzuki, S., Aranishi, T., & Cai, Z. (2018). Comparative usability study of the dulaglutide single-use pen versus the insulin degludec FlexTouch® among self-injection-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 34(6), 1117–1124. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2018.1448260

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free