Computed tomography-guided percutaneous cryoablation of T1b renal tumors: safety, functional and oncological outcomes

24Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety, functional and oncological outcomes associated with percutaneous cryoablation of stage T1b renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Materials and methods: Institutional database was reviewed to identify patients treated by percutaneous CT-guidance cryoablation between 2013 and 2018 for biopsy-proven RCC tumors measuring 4.1–7.0 cm. The main outcome parameters analyzed were primary and secondary technique efficacy, progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), loss of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and complications. PFS and CSS were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Complications were graded by the Clavien–Dindo system. Results: Twenty-three consecutive patients were included (mean tumor diameter: 45.6 ± 6.2 mm; mean RENAL score: 8.1 ± 1.8). The technical success rate was 95.7%. Primary and secondary technique efficacy rates were 86.3 and 100%, respectively. Three patients found to have incomplete ablations at 3 months were successfully treated by repeat cryoablation. Median duration follow-up was 11 months (range: 3-33). Imaging showed PFS to be 85.7% at 6 months, 66.7% at 12 months and 66.7% at 24 months. One patient with a local recurrence at 12 months was treated by radical nephrectomy. One patient died from progression of disease within 12 months. One patient reported a complication grade ≥ II (4.3%). Mean eGFR loss was 4.4 ± 8.5 ml/min/1.73m2, which was significantly higher among those treated for central tumors (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grange, R., Tradi, F., Izaaryene, J., Daidj, N., Brunelle, S., Walz, J., … Piana, G. (2019). Computed tomography-guided percutaneous cryoablation of T1b renal tumors: safety, functional and oncological outcomes. International Journal of Hyperthermia, 36(1), 1065–1071. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2019.1675913

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free