Early Outcomes from Early Tracheostomy for Patients with COVID-19

71Citations
Citations of this article
117Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Importance: Decision-making in the timing of tracheostomy in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has centered on the intersection of long-standing debates on the benefits of early vs late tracheostomy, assumptions about timelines of infectivity of the novel coronavirus, and concern over risk to surgeons performing tracheostomy. Multiple consensus guidelines recommend avoiding or delaying tracheostomy, without evidence to indicate anticipated improvement in outcomes as a result. Objective: To assess outcomes from early tracheostomy in the airway management of patients with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective medical record review was completed of 148 patients with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation at a single tertiary-care medical center in New York City from March 1 to May 7, 2020. Interventions: Open or percutaneous tracheostomy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were time from symptom onset to (1) endotracheal intubation, (2) tracheostomy; time from endotracheal intubation to tracheostomy; time from tracheostomy to (1) tracheostomy tube downsizing, (2) decannulation; total time on mechanical ventilation; and total length of stay. Results: Participants included 148 patients, 120 men and 28 women, with an overall mean (SD) age of 58.1 (15.8) years. Mean (SD; median) time from symptom onset to intubation was 10.57 (6.58; 9) days; from symptom onset to tracheostomy, 22.76 (8.84; 21) days; and from endotracheal intubation to tracheostomy, 12.23 (6.82; 12) days. The mean (SD; median) time to discontinuation of mechanical ventilation was 33.49 (18.82; 27) days; from tracheostomy to first downsize, 23.02 (13.76; 19) days; and from tracheostomy to decannulation, 30.16 (16.00; 26) days. The mean (SD; median) length of stay for all patients was 51.29 (23.66; 45) days. Timing of tracheostomy was significantly associated with length of stay: median length of stay was 40 days in those who underwent early tracheostomy (within 10 days of endotracheal intubation) and 49 days in those who underwent late tracheostomy (median difference, -8; 95% CI, -15 to -1). In a competing risks model with death as the competing risk, the late tracheostomy group was 16% less likely to discontinue mechanical ventilation (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.28). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study from the first 2 months of the pandemic in New York City provides an opportunity to reconsider guidelines for tracheostomy for patients with COVID-19. Findings demonstrated noninferiority of early tracheostomy and challenges recommendations to categorically delay or avoid tracheostomy in this patient population. When aligned with emerging evidence about the timeline of infectivity of the novel coronavirus, this approach may optimize outcomes from tracheostomy while keeping clinicians safe.

References Powered by Scopus

A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation

40766Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk

11332Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019

4970Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Association of Early vs Late Tracheostomy Placement with Pneumonia and Ventilator Days in Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-analysis

77Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Systematic review and meta-analysis of tracheostomy outcomes in COVID-19 patients

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Association of Tracheostomy with Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 Transmission among Health Care Professionals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kwak, P. E., Connors, J. R., Benedict, P. A., Timen, M. R., Wang, B., Zhang, Y., … Amin, M. R. (2021). Early Outcomes from Early Tracheostomy for Patients with COVID-19. JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 147(3), 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2020.4837

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 31

56%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

18%

Researcher 9

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 46

75%

Nursing and Health Professions 13

21%

Design 1

2%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

2%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 5

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free