Identifying evidence quality for updating evidence-based medical guidelines

6Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Evidence-based medical guidelines contain a collection of recommendations which have been created using the best clinical research findings (a.k.a. evidences) of the highest value to aid in the delivery of optimum clinical care to patients. In evidence-based medical guidelines, the conclusions (a.k.a. recommendations) are marked with different evidence levels according to quality of the supporting evidences. Finding new relevant and higher quality evidences is an important issue for supporting the process of updating medical guidelines. In this paper, we propose a method to automatically identify all evidence classes. Furthermore, the proposed approach has been implemented by a rule-based approach, in which the identification knowledge is formalized as a set of rules in the declarative logic programming language Prolog, so that the knowledge can be easily maintained, updated, and re-used. Our experiments show that the proposed method for identifying the evidence quality has a recall of 0.35 and a precision of 0.42. For the identification of Aclass evidences (the top evidence class), the performance of the proposed method improves to recall = 0.63 and precision = 0.74.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, Z., Hu, Q., ten Teije, A., & van Harmelen, F. (2015). Identifying evidence quality for updating evidence-based medical guidelines. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9485, pp. 51–64). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26585-8_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free