Unsteady CFD with Heat and Mass Transfer Simulation of Solar Adsorption Cooling System for Optimal Design and Performance

  • Yaïci W
  • Entchev E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of the work described here was to investigate the effects of design and operating parameters on the performance of an adsorption cooling system. An unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) coupled with heat a mass transfer model was created for predicting the flow behaviour, pressure, temperature, and water adsorption distributions. Silica gel and zeolite 13X were both considered as possible adsorbents, though the study included silica gel given the lower working temperature range required for operation, which makes it more appropriate for residential cooling applications powered by solar heat. Validation of the unsteady computation results with experimental data found in the literature has shown a good agreement. Different computation cases during the desorption process were simulated in a parametric study that considered adsorbent bed thickness (lbed), heat exchanger tube thickness (b), heat transfer fluid (HTF) velocity (v), and adsorbent particle diameter (dp), to systematically analyse the effects of key geometrical and operating parameters on the system performance. The CFD results revealed the importance of v, lbed and dp while b had relatively insignificant changes in the system performance. Moreover, the coupled CFD with heat and mass transfer model is suitable as a valuable tool for simulating and optimising adsorption cooling systems and for predicting their performance.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yaïci, W., & Entchev, E. (2019). Unsteady CFD with Heat and Mass Transfer Simulation of Solar Adsorption Cooling System for Optimal Design and Performance. In Advanced Computational Fluid Dynamics for Emerging Engineering Processes - Eulerian vs. Lagrangian. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81144

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

78%

Researcher 2

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Chemical Engineering 4

50%

Engineering 2

25%

Energy 1

13%

Mathematics 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0