Effects of a pelvic floor muscle training in nulliparous athletes with urinary incontinence: biomechanical models protocol

9Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Urinary Incontinence (UI) is a prevalent condition among active women, especially in young nulliparous athletes. However, up to now, only a few studies conducted pelvic floor muscles training (PFMT) in athletes with UI. So, the present study evaluated the effect of a comprehensive PFMT protocol on UI symptoms in young nulliparous athletes using biomechanical models. This was a experimental and longitudinal pre and post-test evaluations study with 9 young nulliparous athletes divided in 2 intervention groups: one group had supervision of a physiotherapist and another does not. The participants answered the questionnaires: CONTILIFE to investigate the quality of life, the Self-efficacy Scale of Broome to evaluate the capacity of pelvic floor muscles (PFM) contraction, the IPAQ-SF to quantify the physical activity level and socio-demographic characteristics, to characterize the sample. Additionally, they were clinically assessed by Pad-test to quantify urine loss and by the Oxford Grading Scale and Perineometry to evaluate the strength of PFM contraction. It was used the T-test for two independent samples and the Manny-Whitney test to compare the groups, as well as the Spearman Correlation to correlational analysis. The level of significance was p ≤ 0.05. Seven athletes concluded the 8 weeks-protocol. The protocol shown to be effective in reduce the loss of urine. Further research is necessary to determine the specific PFMT protocol in women that perform exercise.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sousa, M., Viana, R., Viana, S., Da Roza, T., Azevedo, R., AraÚjo, M., … Natal Jorge, R. M. (2015). Effects of a pelvic floor muscle training in nulliparous athletes with urinary incontinence: biomechanical models protocol. Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics, 21, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15799-3_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free