Traditional notions of measurement error typically rely on a strong mean-zero assumption on the expectation of the errors conditional on an unobservable “true score”(classical measurement error) or on the data themselves (Berkson measurement error).Weakly calibrated measurements for an unobservable true quantity are defined based on aweaker mean-zero assumption, giving rise to a measurement model of differential error.Applications show it retains many attractive features of estimation and inference whenperforming a naive data analysis (i.e. when performing an analysis on the error-pronemeasurements themselves), and other interesting properties not present in the classical orBerkson cases. Applied researchers concerned with measurement error should considerweakly calibrated errors and rely on the stronger formulations only when both a strongermodel's assumptions are justifiable and would result in appreciable inferential gains
CITATION STYLE
Kroc, E., & Zumbo, B. D. (2018). Calibration of Measurements. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.22237/JMASM/1555355848
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.