Misallocation, access to finance, and public credit: Firm-level evidence

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Using a database of 23,000 firms in 45 economies, we test the quantitative importance of access to finance and access to public and private credit for the determination of misallocation. We first derive measures of factor market and size distortions, and then use these measures within a regression framework to test the significance of self-declared access-to-finance obstacles as well as the effect of access to a credit line issued by either a government-owned or private bank. We find that access-to-finance obstacles and private credit increase the dispersion of distortions. Public credit has a very small effect. For firms that do not face financial obstacles, public credit increases the dispersion of distortions; for firms that face financial obstacles, it slightly decreases dispersion. Public credit does not appear to compensate for the distortions that exist in private credit markets. Quantitatively, however, financial variables explain a very small part of the dispersion of factor market and size distortions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Léon-Ledesma, M. A., & Christopoulos, D. (2016). Misallocation, access to finance, and public credit: Firm-level evidence. Asian Development Review, 33(2Special Issue), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1162/ADEV_a_00075

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free