Reflections on and Extensions of the Fuller and Tabor Theory of Rough Surface Adhesion

26Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The classical Fuller and Tabor theory of rough surface adhesion is reviewed, and its limited applicability noted. New results using an extension of the JKR adhesion theory to include the effect of van der Waals adhesion forces are described. These show the influence of the Tabor parameter μ: moderate values of µ (µ<100) lead to increased forces during loading, and so are found to predict much lower hysteresis losses. A further extension is to replace the GW surface roughness model used by Fuller and Tabor by a model based on the Nayak model of a surface as a random field, as in the Bush, Gibson and Thomas (BGT) theory of non-adhesive contact. The results are qualitatively the same, and the differences may well be largely due to the necessary redefinition of the adhesion index using the rms profile curvature in place of the asperity radius of curvature used in the GW model.

References Powered by Scopus

Untersuchungen über die Reibung und Adhäsion, IV - Theorie des Anhaftens kleiner Teilchen

2087Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Adhesion of spheres: The JKR-DMT transition using a dugdale model

1791Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Surface forces and surface interactions

1061Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The role of adhesion in contact mechanics

147Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of roughness on the adhesive tractions between contacting bodies

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On stickiness of multiscale randomly rough surfaces

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Greenwood, J. A. (2017). Reflections on and Extensions of the Fuller and Tabor Theory of Rough Surface Adhesion. Tribology Letters, 65(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-017-0938-1

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

67%

Researcher 4

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 12

75%

Materials Science 2

13%

Physics and Astronomy 1

6%

Psychology 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free