Research governance delays for a multicentre non-interventional study

20Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the delay in research governance approval for a non-interventional, multicentre study in the United Kingdom. Design The times taken from application to the granting of research governance approval for an observational study of childhood stroke with ethical approval were prospectively recorded. Setting Ninety-two acute NHST rusts in the United Kingdom. Main outcome measures Median delay (in working days) between application and research governance approval. Results The median delay between application and research governance approval was 43 working days (interquartile range 27-62, range 0-147).The reason for delay beyond 43 working days was inexplicable in 30 (70%) of 44 trusts. Conclusions There is considerable variation in the processes undertaken by research and development departments that can lead to significant delays in commencing an ethically approved study. Any improvements to the systems for gaining approval are welcome.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mallick, A. A., & O’Callaghan, F. J. K. (2009). Research governance delays for a multicentre non-interventional study. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 102(5), 195–198. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2009.080397

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free