Maternal health interventions in resource limited countries: A systematic review of packages, impacts and factors for change

137Citations
Citations of this article
577Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The burden of maternal mortality in resource limited countries is still huge despite being at the top of the global public health agenda for over the last 20 years. We systematically reviewed the impacts of interventions on maternal health and factors for change in these countries.Methods: A systematic review was carried out using the guidelines for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Articles published in the English language reporting on implementation of interventions, their impacts and underlying factors for maternal health in resource limited countries in the past 23 years were searched from PubMed, Popline, African Index Medicus, internet sources including reproductive health gateway and Google, hand-searching, reference lists and grey literature.Results: Out of a total of 5084 articles resulting from the search only 58 qualified for systematic review. Programs integrating multiple interventions were more likely to have significant positive impacts on maternal outcomes. Training in emergency obstetric care (EmOC), placement of care providers, refurbishment of existing health facility infrastructure and improved supply of drugs, consumables and equipment for obstetric care were the most frequent interventions integrated in 52% - 65% of all 54 reviewed programs. Statistically significant reduction of maternal mortality ratio and case fatality rate were reported in 55% and 40% of the programs respectively. Births in EmOC facilities and caesarean section rates increased significantly in 71% - 75% of programs using these indicators. Insufficient implementation of evidence-based interventions in resources limited countries was closely linked to a lack of national resources, leadership skills and end-users factors.Conclusions: This article presents a list of evidenced-based packages of interventions for maternal health, their impacts and factors for change in resource limited countries. It indicates that no single magic bullet intervention exists for reduction of maternal mortality and that all interventional programs should be integrated in order to bring significant changes. State leaders and key actors in the health sectors in these countries and the international community are proposed to translate the lessons learnt into actions and intensify efforts in order to achieve the goals set for maternal health. © 2011 Nyamtema et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration

12387Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980-2008: a systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5

1570Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of a participatory intervention with women's groups on birth outcomes in Nepal: Cluster-randomised controlled trial

651Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Reasons for home delivery and use of traditional birth attendants in rural Zambia: A qualitative study

130Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Applying the lessons of maternal mortality reduction to global emergency health

112Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Inequity in India: The case of maternal and reproductive health

112Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nyamtema, A. S., Urassa, D. P., & van Roosmalen, J. (2011). Maternal health interventions in resource limited countries: A systematic review of packages, impacts and factors for change. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-11-30

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250255075100

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 255

67%

Researcher 85

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 28

7%

Professor / Associate Prof. 15

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 204

58%

Nursing and Health Professions 74

21%

Social Sciences 58

16%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
References: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0