The limitations and potential adverse effects of the premature ventricular contraction response

3Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A 69-year-old man, who had undergone surgery for mitral and tricuspid regurgitation with the Maze procedure for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, was admitted with an episode of syncope due to sick sinus syndrome. Three days after implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker (Accent MRI™, St. Jude Medical Inc.,), ventricular pacing on T-wave was recorded multiple times. St. Jude Medical Inc. pacemakers have a unique additional algorithm, called premature ventricular contraction response, related to preventing pacemaker-mediated tachycardia. This algorithm was determined to be a cause of ventricular pacing on T-wave. We report the limitations and potential adverse effects of such automated algorithms.

References Powered by Scopus

Asynchronous ventricular pacing triggering ventricular fibrillation

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Atrial pace on PVC algorithm inducing ventricular fibrillation

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Novel findings of an old algorithm: PVC response “Atrial Pace’’ initiates atrial arrhythmias in Abbott ICD and CRT-D devices

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preventive algorithm ending up being the “Cause”!

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A case of inappropriate pacing due to intermittent His bundle capture and the post–atrial pacing ventricular blanking period of managed ventricular pacing

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Konishi, H., Fukuzawa, K., Mori, S., Kiuchi, K., & Hirata, K. I. (2018). The limitations and potential adverse effects of the premature ventricular contraction response. Journal of Arrhythmia, 34(5), 572–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12082

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

57%

Researcher 3

43%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

71%

Computer Science 1

14%

Materials Science 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free