Language modality influences risk perception: Innovations read well but sound even better

5Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Psychological theories implicitly assume that the modality in which information is conveyed—spoken or written—leaves judgment and choice unaltered. Modality is rarely considered in textbooks on judgment and decision making, and the selection of modality in research is often based on convenience. We challenge this theoretical assumption. Three experiments (N = 984) show that the modality in which novel technologies are described systematically influences their perceived risk and benefit. Participants either read or heard advantages and disadvantages of novel technologies and then assessed their risk and benefit. In Study 1, spoken descriptions prompted more positive evaluations toward the technologies in terms of overall risks and benefits than written descriptions. Studies 2 and 3 replicated this modality effect and demonstrated that affect partially explains it, as spoken descriptions induced more positive feelings toward the new technologies than written descriptions. Study 3 (preregistered) showed that the influence of modality is unique to novel technologies and does not extend to familiar ones. These findings contribute theoretically to the understanding of the relationship between language and thought, and carry implications for survey research and the use of voice assistant technology.

References Powered by Scopus

G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

45513Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Choices, values, and frames

4817Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Risk as Feelings

4459Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Effects of message delivery on cross-cultural biosecurity compliance: Insights from experimental simulations

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Apocalypse now or later? Nuclear war risk perceptions mirroring media coverage and emotional tone shifts in Italian news

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

It is, uh, very likely? The impact of prosodic uncertainty cues on the perception and interpretation of spoken verbal probability phrases

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Geipel, J., Hadjichristidis, C., Savadori, L., & Keysar, B. (2023). Language modality influences risk perception: Innovations read well but sound even better. Risk Analysis, 43(3), 558–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13917

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

44%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 3

30%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

30%

Psychology 3

30%

Design 1

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 4

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0