Influence of a simple fracture intersection on density-driven immiscible flow: Wetting vs. nonwetting flows

11Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The influence of a single fracture intersection on density-driven immiscible flow is compared between wetting (water into air) and nonwetting (Trichloroethylene into water) flows. At low supply rates, the intersection acted as a hysteretic gate to pulsed flow of the wetting phase, but had minimal influence on nonwetting phase flow. For both cases, increasing the supply rate led to the formation of continuous fluid tendrils that crossed the intersection without interruption. The wetting experiment returned to pulsed flow as the supply rate was decreased, while the nonwetting experiment maintained a continuous flow structure. Results suggest a fundamental difference between wetting and nonwetting phase flows in fracture networks. Copyright 2004 by the American Geophysical Union.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ji, S. H., Nicholl, M. J., Glass, R. J., & Lee, K. K. (2004). Influence of a simple fracture intersection on density-driven immiscible flow: Wetting vs. nonwetting flows. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(14). https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020045

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free