A framework for understanding the quality of evidence use in education

13Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There are growing expectations internationally that schools and systems will use research evidence to inform their improvement efforts. Such developments raise important questions about what it means to use research evidence well in education. To date, there has been wide-ranging debate about what counts as quality evidence, but very little dialogue about what counts as quality use. In response, this article presents a conceptual framework to define and elaborate what quality use of research evidence might mean in relation to education. The framework is informed by a cross-sector systematic review and narrative synthesis of 112 relevant publications from four sectors: health, social care, education and policy. The review explored if, and how, quality of evidence use had been defined and described within each of these sectors in order to inform a quality use framework for education. Based on the cross-sector review, quality use of research evidence is framed in terms of two core components: (1) appropriate research evidence and (2) thoughtful engagement and implementation, supported by three individual enabling components (skillsets, mindsets and relationships) and three organisational enabling components (leadership, culture and infrastructure), as well as system-level influences. There is potential for this framework to inform current approaches to the use of research in education. There is also an important need to test and refine its components through further empirical investigation, theoretical inquiry and intervention development.

References Powered by Scopus

Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations

4961Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods

1457Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: Audit of primary sources

1431Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Generative AI in the Australian education system: An open data set of stakeholder recommendations and emerging analysis from a public inquiry

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quality use of research evidence: practitioner perspectives

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

School Educators’ Use of Research: Findings from Two Large-Scale Australian Studies

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rickinson, M., Cirkony, C., Walsh, L., Gleeson, J., Cutler, B., & Salisbury, M. (2022). A framework for understanding the quality of evidence use in education. Educational Research, 64(2), 133–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2022.2054452

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

71%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

24%

Researcher 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 7

50%

Psychology 4

29%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

14%

Computer Science 1

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free