Critical hemodynamic therapy oriented resuscitation helping reduce lung water production and improve survival

10Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BackgroundIncreased extravascular lung water (EVLW) in shock is common in the critically ill patients. This study aimed to explore the effect of cardiac output (CO) on EVLW and its relevant influence on prognosis.MethodsThe hemodynamic data of 428 patients with pulse-indicated continuous CO catheterization from Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The patients were assigned to acute respiratory distress syndrome group, cardiogenic shock group, septic shock group, and combined shock (cardiogenic and septic) group according to their symptoms. Information on 28-day mortality and renal function was also collected.ResultsThe CO and EVLW index (EVLWI) in the cardiogenic and combined shock groups were lower than those in the other groups (acute respiratory distress syndrome group vs. cardiogenic shock group vs. septic shock group vs. combined shock group: CO, 5.1 [4.0, 6.2] vs. 4.7 [4.0, 5.7] vs. 5.5 [4.3, 6.7] vs. 4.6 [3.5, 5.7] at 0 to 24 h, P=0.009; 4.6 [3.8, 5.6] vs. 4.8 [4.1, 5.7] vs. 5.3 [4.4, 6.5] vs. 4.5 [3.8, 5.3] at 24 to 48 h, P=0.048; 4.5 [4.1, 5.4] vs. 4.8 [3.8, 5.5] vs. 5.3 [4.0, 6.4] vs. 4.0 [3.2, 5.4] at 48 to 72 h, P=0.006; EVLWI, 11.4 [8.7, 19.1] vs. 7.9 [6.6, 10.0] vs. 8.8 [7.4, 11.0] vs. 8.2 [6.7, 11.3] at 0 to 24 h, P<0.001; 11.8 [7.7, 17.2] vs. 7.8 [6.3, 10.2] vs. 8.7 [6.6, 12.2] vs. 8.0 [6.6, 11.1] at 24 to 48 h, P<0.001; and 11.3 [7.7, 18.7] vs. 7.5 [6.3, 10.0] vs. 8.8 [6.3, 12.2] vs. 8.4 [6.4, 11.2] at 48 to 72 h, P<0.001. The trend of the EVLWI in the septic shock group was higher than that in the cardiogenic shock group (P<0.05). Moreover, there existed some difference in the pulmonary vascular permeability index among the cardiogenic shock group, the septic shock group, and the combined shock group, without statistical significance (P>0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in tissue perfusion or renal function among the four groups during the observation period (P>0.05). However, the cardiogenic shock group had a higher 28-day survival rate than the other three groups [log rank (Mantel-Cox) = 31.169, P<0.001].ConclusionTissue-aimed lower CO could reduce the EVLWI and achieve a better prognosis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pan, P., Su, L. X., Zhou, X., Long, Y., Liu, D. W., Wang, X. T., & Chen, X. (2019). Critical hemodynamic therapy oriented resuscitation helping reduce lung water production and improve survival. Chinese Medical Journal, 132(10), 1139–1146. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000205

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free