Skip to main content
Book Chapter

Law, Logic, Rhetoric: A Procedural Model of Legal Argumentation

  • Lodder A
Springer Netherlands, (2009), 569-588
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-2808-3_26
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Legal argumentation can be modeled using logic, but in this chapter it is claimed that logic alone does not suffice. A model should also take the rhetoric nature of legal argumentation into account. DiaLaw is such a model: a formal, procedural model in which the logical and rhetorical aspects of argumentation are combined.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lodder, A. R. (2009). Law, Logic, Rhetoric: A Procedural Model of Legal Argumentation. In Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science (pp. 569–588). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2808-3_26

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free