Comparison of single, end-holed and multi-orifice extradural catheters when used for continuous infusion of local anaesthetic during labour

25Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Single, end-holed and multi-orifice extradural catheters were compared in terms of efficacy and complications when used for infusion of 0.1% bupivacaine during labour. In this study of 364 patients there was no difference in unilateral block after an initial bolus dose (18 (11.5%) for single, end-holed and 16 (10.9%) for multi-orifice catheters). Unilateral block recurred with seven (4.0%) single, end-holed and with eight (4.8%) multi-orifice catheters. Unilateral blocks, arising for the first time during infusion of local anaesthetic, occurred significantly more frequently when single, end-holed catheters were used (29 (16.4%)) compared with multi-orifice catheters (14 (8.4%)) (P < 0.05).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dickson, M. A. S., Moores, C., & McClure, J. H. (1997). Comparison of single, end-holed and multi-orifice extradural catheters when used for continuous infusion of local anaesthetic during labour. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 79(3), 297–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/79.3.297

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free