Controversies in the treatment of mild asthma. What novelties and practical implications?

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Mild asthma is prevalent in childhood and causes as many as 30%–40% asthma exacerbations requiring emergency visits. The management of "intermittent" and "mild persistent" asthma phenotypes is still a matter of debate, even if the role of inhaled corticosteroids, both continuous and intermittent, is a cornerstone in this field. Recent updates of the guidelines on the strategies to manage these patients are coming, since the role of inflammation in these asthma phenotypes is crucial, as well as the potential side effect and risks of short-acting beta 2 agonists overuse, prescribed as the only "as-needed" treatments. In this paper, we overview the new (r)evolution regarding intermittent and mild persistent asthma management.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tosca, M. A., Di Cicco, M. E., Leone, M., Scavone, M., & Licari, A. (2022). Controversies in the treatment of mild asthma. What novelties and practical implications? Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 33(S27), 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.13618

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free