Honesty

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The post-Hegelian ethic of self-interpretation developed in Chapters 8, 9, and 10 might still be regarded as normatively weak, insofar as, in giving up essentialism, we seem to give up any appeal to the notion of a distorted self-conception. However, Nietzsche’s thought supplies what we need to give useful sense to the notion of a distorted self-conception, while remaining sceptical of essentialism. Nietzsche’s emphasis on self-overcoming is grounded in a fundamental appeal to honesty in self-interpretation. Similarly, the sceptical essentialist can re-interpret references to distorted self-conceptions as references to self-conceptions that would, if adopted, be adopted dishonestly. Moreover, since I am not self-sufficient in my self-interpretations, such honesty would have to have a collective basis. Collective honesty would be a suitable foundation for a sceptical essentialist ethic of self-interpretation. The chapter closes with some reflections on the implications of this view for professional ethics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lucas, P. (2011). Honesty. In Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy (Vol. 26, pp. 183–200). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1560-8_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free