Functional outcome after Mason II-III radial head and neck fractures: Study protocol for a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA statement

0Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Fractures of the radial head and neck are the most common fractures of the elbow, and account for approximately one-third of all elbow fractures. Depending on the fracture type the treatment is either conservative or surgical. There is no absolute consensus regarding optimal treatment for different fracture types. The aim of this protocol is to present the method that will be used to collect, describe and analyse the current evidence regarding the treatment of Mason II-III radial head and neck fractures. Method and analysis: We will conduct a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol (PRISMA-P) guidelines statement. We will search a number of databases with a predefined search strategy to collect both randomised and nonrandomised studies. The articles will be summarised with descriptive statistics. If applicable a meta-analysis will be conducted. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required since this is a protocol for a systematic review and no primary data will be collected. The authors will publish findings from this review in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hagelberg, M., Thune, A., Krupic, F., Salomonsson, B., & Sköldenberg, O. (2017, January 1). Functional outcome after Mason II-III radial head and neck fractures: Study protocol for a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA statement. BMJ Open. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free