Could packers manipulate spot markets by tying contracts to futures prices? And do they?

4Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Some producers, policy makers, and researchers claim that packers influence cash prices through contracts tied to futures prices. This paper provides a theoretical and empirical study on the price effects of contract-pricing terms linked to futures price and the related formula pricing terms linked to a cash price. We show that contract-pricing terms tied to a cattle futures price can theoretically be used to reduce the cash price. Furthermore, the model demonstrates that such tied-to-a-futures-price contract-pricing clauses and the related tied-to-a-cash-price formula pricing clauses can be substitutable tools for packers to depress the cash cattle price. Nevertheless, although empirical results are consistent with the predictions of the theoretical model they show that while such manipulations may occur, their market power impact appears quite small.

References Powered by Scopus

The economics of grain price volatility

276Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Index funds, financialization, and commodity futures markets

266Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Market power, misconceptions, and modern agricultural markets

197Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Contract farming problems and games under yield uncertainty

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Oligopsonistic Input Substitution in a Thin Market

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multi-plant coordination in the U.S. beef packing industry

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xia, T., Crespi, J. M., & Dhuyvetter, K. C. (2019). Could packers manipulate spot markets by tying contracts to futures prices? And do they? Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12179

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘2400.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0