Determination of natural versus laboratory human infection with Mayaro virus by molecular analysis

17Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A laboratory worker developed clinical signs of infection with Mayaro virus (Togaviridae), an arbovirus of South and Central America, 6 days after preparation of Mayaro viral antigen and 10 days after a trip to a rain forest. There was no evidence of skin lesions during the antigen preparation, and level 3 containment safety measures were followed. Therefore, molecular characterization of the virus was undertaken to identify the source of infection. RT-PCR and DNA sequence comparisons proved the infection was with the laboratory strain. Airborne Mayaro virus contamination is thus a hazard to laboratory personnel.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Junt, T., Heraud, J. M., Lelarge, J., Labeau, B., & Talarmin, A. (1999). Determination of natural versus laboratory human infection with Mayaro virus by molecular analysis. Epidemiology and Infection, 123(3), 511–513. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268899003180

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free