Distance travelled: outcomes and evidence in flexible learning options

11Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Flexible learning options (FLOs) provide individualised learning pathways for disengaged young people with strong emphasis on inclusivity and wellbeing support. Amidst a rapid expansion of Australia’s flexible learning sector, service providers are under increasing pressure to substantiate participant outcomes. This paper stems from a national study of the value of FLOs to young people and the broader Australian community. The study enumerates the outcomes valued by flexible learning practitioners, as well as the various evidence forms they cite to substantiate participant outcomes. Framing success as ‘distance travelled’ (i.e. an individual’s progress relative to his or her own starting point), practitioners demonstrate critical awareness of the social and structural mechanisms by which young people are marginalised from mainstream schooling. Holistic assessment practices also reveal practitioners’ efforts to expand the terms of reference by which educational outcomes may be validated in alternative education settings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thomas, J., McGinty, S., Riele, K. te, & Wilson, K. (2017). Distance travelled: outcomes and evidence in flexible learning options. Australian Educational Researcher, 44(4–5), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-017-0239-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free