Adherence to iron supplementation during pregnancy in Tanzania: Determinants and hematologic consequences

71Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Limited adherence to iron supplementation is thought to be a major reason for the low effectiveness of anemiaprevention programs. In rural Tanzania, women at 21-26 wk of gestation were randomly given either 120 mg of a conventional (Con) iron supplement or 50 mg of a gastric-delivery-system (GDS) iron supplement for 12 wk. Adherence was assessed by using a pill bottle equipped with an electronic counting device. Adherence in the GDS group was 61% compared with 42% for the Con group. In both groups, women experiencing side effects had about one-third lower adherence. Fewer side effects were observed in the GDS group. In a subgroup of women with a low initial hemoglobin concentration (≤ 120 g/L), the response to the iron supplements suggested that both of the applied doses were unnecessarily high for adequate hematologic response in a population with a marginal hemoglobin concentration. The GDS group appeared to require a dose one-fourth as high as that of the Con group for an equal effect on improving hemoglobin to normal concentrations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ekström, E. C. M., Kavishe, F. P., Habicht, J. P., Frongillo, E. A., Rasmussen, K. M., & Hemed, L. (1996). Adherence to iron supplementation during pregnancy in Tanzania: Determinants and hematologic consequences. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 64(3), 368–374. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/64.3.368

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free